- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:37:01 -0500
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, ext Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Patrick Stickler wrote: > On 2002-02-12 20:28, "ext Frank Manola" <fmanola@mitre.org> wrote: > > >>Patrick says the language is non-existent in the >>RDF graph. >> > > Insofar as most examples, representations, DT discussions, etc. I.e. that > based on most materials and discussions, it seems to be a rather common > view that literals are simple strings. I've yet to see a single example > where the literal was represented as a string-language pairing. > > Clearly, some implementations do treat literals as pairings. > > It was stated that ARP does this, but if I enter > > <dc:title xml:lang="en">World Wide Web Consortium</dc:title> > > in the W3C RDF validator, I don't see 'en' reflected in either the > triples or the graph. Is it then optional functionality not used > by the validator? Or is that functionality in a later version of ARP > than what is used by the validator? > > (this isn't a criticism or refutation, just an honest question) Patrick-- Could I sum up what you just said by saying "Patrick says the language is non-existent in the RDF graph"? :-) --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 07:32:12 UTC