- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:02:27 -0600
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-02-15 3:53 PM, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> wrote: >> a) In the REST architectural model (which the TAG seems to be agreeing >> about) fragment identifiers only make sense within the context of an HTTP >> response (a bag of bits). They identify parts of a document, not general >> Resources like full URIs. > > Wait a minute. Are you saying that every 'genuine' resource must be > an document?? And that part of a document cannot be a resource??? > That is an impossibly narrow view of 'resource'. I'm saying the opposite. It seems you're not understanding me at all. Not sure what else to do. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 17:02:28 UTC