- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:47:12 +0100
- To: brian_mcbride@hp.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> We have to decide on Dan Brickley's equality test. Does > > _:s1 <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> . > _:s1 <rdf:subject> <subject> . > _:s1 <rdf:predicate> <predicate> . > _:s1 <rdf:object> <object> . > > _:s2 <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> . > _:s2 <rdf:subject> <subject> . > _:s2 <rdf:predicate> <predicate> . > _:s2 <rdf:object> <object> . > > _:s1 <property> "property" . > > entail: > > _:s2 <property> "property" . > > Brian Yes (confirmed with Euler) the _:s2 in the entailed graph could have been any _:label actually I see that already _:s1 <property> "property" . entails _:s2 <property> "property" . so I don't see the point of reification -- Jos
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2002 17:52:09 UTC