- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 17:22:01 -0600
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>On 2002-02-21 0:29, "ext Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> wrote: > >> Ok, guys. Another version now at >> http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/simpledatatype1.html >> This changes the previous one as follows. >> >> 1. S-B idiom now works with rdfs:drange; in fact, the S-A and S-B >> idioms are synonymous and can be interchanged with each other. > >Right. This basically adopts the earlier suggestion in conjuction >with the first versions of the convergence proposal that in the context >of datatyping, any inline idiom could/should be treated as a value >triple -- in fact, it was suggested that the inline idiom would >be treated as a contracted form of the value triple idiom, and >always result in a value triple in the graph. > >That > > <ppp>foo</ppp> > >is just syntactic sugar for > > <ppp><rdf:Description><dlex>foo</dlex></rdf:Description></ppp> > >It just leaves such a transformation as "virtual" and provides >that interpretation in the MT/semantics (which is fine). Right, that is exactly what it does. Is that acceptable to everyone? Would DC and CC/PP be happy with that?? Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 18:22:03 UTC