- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 13:32:41 -0500
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- CC: Misha.Wolf@reuters.com, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Martin Duerst wrote: > However, the RDF core group, as they explained to us, needs a > definition that had the properties of equivalence classes [...] > > For this, the only reasonable solution was that both text and > language have to match. Fair enough. RDF does not allow the assertion of any properties of literals, so that is not so bad. -- John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2002 13:33:14 UTC