Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified

At 17:32 13/02/2002 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:
[...]
>>I think this decision effectively makes rdf:subject etc. vocabulary
>>useless, i.e. not having any special meaning (I believe Pat made this
>>point earlier). In other words, 4-triple reification becomes effectively
>>deprecated (which is fine with me).

I disagree.  It works just fine, in either Statement or Stating 
interpretation for my use of it in the P3P schema.


>How about adding a straw poll on the last sentence to the reification 
>subagenda?

We already decided not to shoot it.  Please move forwards, not backwards.

Brian

Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 09:45:13 UTC