- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:43:41 +0000
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Cc: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 17:32 13/02/2002 -0500, Frank Manola wrote: [...] >>I think this decision effectively makes rdf:subject etc. vocabulary >>useless, i.e. not having any special meaning (I believe Pat made this >>point earlier). In other words, 4-triple reification becomes effectively >>deprecated (which is fine with me). I disagree. It works just fine, in either Statement or Stating interpretation for my use of it in the P3P schema. >How about adding a straw poll on the last sentence to the reification >subagenda? We already decided not to shoot it. Please move forwards, not backwards. Brian
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 09:45:13 UTC