- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:05:37 -0600
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- CC: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
On 2002-02-24 2:54 PM, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> wrote: > ex:age rdfs:range _:x . > xsd:integer rdfs:range _:x . > > If that is acceptable, then that solves the problem, since it frees > up the datatype name itself to have the value space as its extension > when used as a class name. I have no problem with the basic concept behind this, but I think that this specific version of it isn't going to work since it's impossible to write in RDF/XML. > Of course we cannot use rdfs:range in this case, so this would > require us to reconsider decision (1); but the required change is > minimal. I think Brian made it very clear that the <range> in one wasn't necessarily rdfs:range. It could also be rdfd:range. I think this would be an adequate solution also. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2002 16:05:41 UTC