Re: Primer status and Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01

At 05:51 PM 2/2/02 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:
>For the record, I'll repeat (sort of) what I said on the telecon:  my 
>current belief is that the primer should try to introduce all the major 
>documents produced by the WG, at least to the extent of explaining why 
>they're there.  In the case of the model theory, I don't see the primer 
>giving a tutorial on the RDF model theory, but I think the primer should 
>briefly describe why there is one (and give the reader some feel for 
>whether it's important for s/he to fully understand the document, or 
>whether s/he can give it a miss).

I agree with this.

For what it's worth, I'm working on some words for a non-RDFcore activity, 
which address this.  When I feel they're together, I'll send them in as 
possible raw material for the primer.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
        __
       /\ \
      /  \ \
     / /\ \ \
    / / /\ \ \
   / / /__\_\ \
  / / /________\
  \/___________/

Received on Sunday, 3 February 2002 15:53:46 UTC