- From: <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:53:40 +0000
- To: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Friday, February 8, 2002, at 10:53 , ext Brian McBride wrote: > Issue B1: > ========= > > status: proposed resolution > > In S, if one wants to use both idiom A and idiom B, e.g. > > <mary> <age> "10" . > <age> <rdfs:range> <xsd:integer.lex> . > > and > > <mary> <ageD> _:a . > _:a <xsd:integer.map> "10" . > > two properties have to be used, <age> and <ageD>, in this example. > > Sergey suggests that the range of <age> can be the UNION of xsdr:integer. > map and xsdr:integer.lex and xsdr:integer.val. Well, actually I suggested it... ;-) but I'm very glad Sergey and I now seem to "connect" on this understanding. > Patrick: are you satisfied? > Maybe. If that means that a datatype URI denotes the whole datatype and nothing but the datatype so help us RDF, and the *.(map|val|lex) distinctions live only in the MT, then yes. But then, that's what I've been saying all along ;-) Cheers, Patrick
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 06:52:23 UTC