- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 07:48:26 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-02-18 23:41, "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > (a) enough RDF/XML examples to get going in monkey-see-monkey-do fashion Did either of the following sets of use cases help to address this? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0469.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0478.html > (b) S-B, i.e. a way to use rdfs:range to restrict the range > of a property to the lexical space of some datatype. Does the union interpretation of rdfs:drange, which treats the inline (S-B) and value triple idioms as synonymous, and the addition of the lexical range specific rdfs:lrange property address this? Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 00:46:56 UTC