- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 11:12:39 -0800
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDFCore WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Graham Klyne wrote: > > At 02:09 PM 2/4/02 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: > >At 10:51 01/02/2002 -0800, Sergey Melnik wrote: > >[...] > > > >> <rdf:Description parseType="untidy"> > >> <age>5</age> > >> <rdf:Description> > > > >This is an interesting approach. I've felt for a while that we are having > >trouble because we are overloading both syntax and semantics onto too few > >primitives in the graph. > > > >This is an example of an approach which tries to separate out the > >syntactic issues. > > > >Patrick doesn't seem that much of a fan. What do other folks think? > > I'm not a fan until I see how it works out in something like N-triples. On the level of N-triples, there would be no changes. It's just the mapping from RDF/XML to N-triples that would need to be extended. However, this extended syntax may not be needed at all, so let's first proceed with the convergence thread... Sergey
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 13:55:44 UTC