Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4]

Rather than continuing with this thread, can we shelve
this for the moment and focus on the very promising
convergence thread which I think will make this a
non-issue in numerous ways.

OK?

Patrick


On 2002-02-06 3:00, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote:

> Agree.  This how I'd expect CC/PP to deal with the issue.  (Speaking for
> myself, etc.)
> 
> #g
> --
> 
> At 12:05 PM 2/5/02 -0500, Daniel W. Connolly wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Brian McBride wrote:
>> 
>>> At 11:15 04/02/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> 
>>>> Yes, *if* one wants to use both idioms, one needs both sorts
>>>> of properties.
>>> 
>>> That's my understanding and what the issue states, I think clearly.
>> 
>> There's some lack of clarity somewhere; folks seem to be arguing:
>> 
>>         if communities need to use both datatyping idioms,
>>         they need double properties.
>> 
>>         PRISM needs datatyping
>>         => therefore
>>         PRISM needs double properties
>> 
>> which isn't a sound inference; it needs another premise:
>> 
>>         PRISM needs to use both datatyping idioms.
>> 
>> I'm quite confident PRISM (and dublin core and most other apps)
>> will do just fine only using S-B.
>> 
>> So I don't think the statement of the issue is sufficiently clear.
>> 
>> --
>> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>> (writing from python10)
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
> Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
> 
> 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 01:50:34 UTC