- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 08:50:54 +0200
- To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Rather than continuing with this thread, can we shelve this for the moment and focus on the very promising convergence thread which I think will make this a non-issue in numerous ways. OK? Patrick On 2002-02-06 3:00, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote: > Agree. This how I'd expect CC/PP to deal with the issue. (Speaking for > myself, etc.) > > #g > -- > > At 12:05 PM 2/5/02 -0500, Daniel W. Connolly wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Brian McBride wrote: >> >>> At 11:15 04/02/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>>> Yes, *if* one wants to use both idioms, one needs both sorts >>>> of properties. >>> >>> That's my understanding and what the issue states, I think clearly. >> >> There's some lack of clarity somewhere; folks seem to be arguing: >> >> if communities need to use both datatyping idioms, >> they need double properties. >> >> PRISM needs datatyping >> => therefore >> PRISM needs double properties >> >> which isn't a sound inference; it needs another premise: >> >> PRISM needs to use both datatyping idioms. >> >> I'm quite confident PRISM (and dublin core and most other apps) >> will do just fine only using S-B. >> >> So I don't think the statement of the issue is sufficiently clear. >> >> -- >> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >> (writing from python10) > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group > Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> > <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> > > -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 01:50:34 UTC