- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:32:23 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Brian McBride wrote: > At 10:25 19/02/2002 +0000, Jan Grant wrote: > [...] > > > > o Are there features that could be dropped and > > > still meet the needs of your users? (Which?) > > > >Of the datatyping options presented, I prefer the doublet approach, for > >what it's worth. > > Does that mean: > > 1 you could drop the datatype triple > 2 you could drop either the doublet or the datatype tripple > and would prefer to drop the triple > 3 none of the above (please clarify) 3. > > > o Does the proposal 'work for you'? > > > >As clean as the resulting MT may be, I still find this construction > >ugly. > > This construction? The blank-node style of constructions, in general. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk I am now available for general use under a modified BSD licence.
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 09:33:15 UTC