- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:57:03 -0000
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr: > The propertyElt production 6.12 of the grammar does not > allow both an ID attribute and a resource attribute to > be specified (owner Dave Beckett) > Dave has made a proposal in the syntax WD; awaiting counter > proposal from Jeremy. My counter proposal was made a while ago: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0018.html i.e. [[[ An rdf:ID attribute is permissable on all property elements and always refers to the resource that is the reification of the triple corresponding to that property element. ]]] The only issue seems to be whether this is a change or a clarification. I don't care which. Given that we are trying to make reification usable for provenance and to force a "reification is intended for provenance" reading from M&S, I think this is sensible. With what I understand of the lack of uniformity in the other proposal actually using the syntactic mechanism for reification becomes a hyper-specialized activity. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 04:57:25 UTC