- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 13:39:37 +0000
- To: Ronald Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 09:36 05/02/2002 -0800, Ronald Daniel wrote:
Summarising some your response:
o complexity is a big issue - keep it simple guys
(Does that mean S-B, on its own, would be enough
for Prism?)
>2) PRISM CAN specify one or the other idiom to be used for its elements.
o tidy literals is acceptable
And a response to this:
>5) A place where I don't see a satisfactory answer: PRISM allows
> both
> <article> <prism:location> "Texas"
> <article> <prism:location> <iso3166-2:us-tx>
> One is a string, the other a term in a controlled vocabulary.
> I could declare the range of prism:location to be a location, but
> that is vacuous.
Could you:
<prism:location> <rdfs:range> <prism:Location> .
<prism:Location> <rdf:type> <rdfs:Class> .
<rdf:Literal> <rdfs:subClassOf> <prism:Location> .
<iso:Location> <rdfs:subClassOf> <prism:Location> .
Danbri?
>I don't see that I can say anything else about
> the data type of the object of the statements.
Hmm, not sure this is a datatyping question.
> Along those lines, here are some 'reasonable' data type declarations
> that can't be made:
> <dc:creator> <rdfs:range> <x:Person> . # Companies can be authors too
> <dc:publisher> <rdfs:range <x:Company> . # people can self-publish
Same trick can apply, I think.
Brian
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 08:41:01 UTC