- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 13:39:37 +0000
- To: Ronald Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 09:36 05/02/2002 -0800, Ronald Daniel wrote: Summarising some your response: o complexity is a big issue - keep it simple guys (Does that mean S-B, on its own, would be enough for Prism?) >2) PRISM CAN specify one or the other idiom to be used for its elements. o tidy literals is acceptable And a response to this: >5) A place where I don't see a satisfactory answer: PRISM allows > both > <article> <prism:location> "Texas" > <article> <prism:location> <iso3166-2:us-tx> > One is a string, the other a term in a controlled vocabulary. > I could declare the range of prism:location to be a location, but > that is vacuous. Could you: <prism:location> <rdfs:range> <prism:Location> . <prism:Location> <rdf:type> <rdfs:Class> . <rdf:Literal> <rdfs:subClassOf> <prism:Location> . <iso:Location> <rdfs:subClassOf> <prism:Location> . Danbri? >I don't see that I can say anything else about > the data type of the object of the statements. Hmm, not sure this is a datatyping question. > Along those lines, here are some 'reasonable' data type declarations > that can't be made: > <dc:creator> <rdfs:range> <x:Person> . # Companies can be authors too > <dc:publisher> <rdfs:range <x:Company> . # people can self-publish Same trick can apply, I think. Brian
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 08:41:01 UTC