W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: reification test case

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:24:46 -0600
Message-Id: <p05101416b884e4486a48@[]>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>On 2002-02-04 19:04, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>>  If anyone needs reminding as to arguments against the entailment, I quoted
>>  some HP feedback I had received at:
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0041.html
>>  I see this as a straight choice and hope we can just vote on it.
>>  Jeremy
>I think that this works for me, i.e. I would vote yes to Jeremy's
>proposal, though I want to chew on it a bit more still...

I vote no. We can handle reification in the MT, don't worry. We just 
have to get clear on what we want.

Jeremy's folk want provenances and quoting, and the former requires a 
NO answer to the entailment test. (You can read quoting either way, 
depending on what you think is being quoted. )

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 20:24:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:09 UTC