- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 08 Feb 2002 08:39:44 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 12:59, Brian McBride wrote: > At 15:51 07/02/2002 +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: > > >Sorry, I missed passing on this feedback about Dublin Core > >and the S-A and S-B proposals: > > > >Roland.Schwaenzl@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE said > > > Support for both hmmm... not that exciting. > > > If possible please avoid B (please no duals). > > DanC: Do you still feel that S-B is critical for DC? S-B is critical for anybody who wants to write <dc:date>2000-12-23</dc:date> and wants tools to flag an inconsistency when they write <dc:date>not the lexical form of any date</dc:date> which is what I thought the DC community was doing and wanted to keep doing. If they change their mind and want to write <dc:date rdfdt:date="2000-12-23"/> or perhaps even <dc:date rdf:value="2000-12-23"/> then I'll be surprised, but I won't mind. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 09:40:33 UTC