Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Sum mary V4]

On 2002-02-05 19:36, "ext Ronald Daniel" <rdaniel@interwoven.com> wrote:


>> I'm quite confident PRISM (and dublin core and most other apps)
>> will do just fine only using S-B.
> 
> Indeed. After considering this, I've concluded that the
> 'double property definition' problem is a complete non-issue
> for PRISM. I don't presume to speak for any other group defining
> a vocabulary, of course.

Ron, please see my reply to Dan on this. I don't think
it's quite so simple as what the ontology owners say
(with all due respect, really ;-)

Patrick
 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 13:43:03 UTC