- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 17:32:58 +0200
- To: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-02-04 17:24, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > At 16:10 04/02/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote: > > [...] > >>> does not entail: >>> >>> <foo> <eg:size> _:s . >>> <bar> <eg:size> _:s . >> >> Firstly, I presume you meant >> >> <foo> <eg:size> _:s2 . >> <bar> <eg:size> _:s1 . > > Nope. Then I have no idea what you are talking about ;-) What is the relation between two separate bnodes with properties to some entirely other bnode? > [...] > >> But even with the S-A idiom, if we have >> >> <foo> <eg:size> _:s1 . >> _:s1 <xsd:double-de> "10,5" . >> >> <bar> <eg:size> _:s2 . >> _:s2 <xsd:double> "10.5" . >> >> this also does not entail >> >> <foo> <eg:size> _:s2 . >> <bar> <eg:size> _:s1 . > > > It is my understanding that it does, and also: If it does, then, per my earlier posting, something is not quite right... This seems to suggest that we could just merge all bNodes into a single bNode and infer what we like about all of the combined properties of the single remaining bNode. You have two different resources <foo> and <bar> that have two different values, one is a member of the value space of xsd:double and the other is a member of the value space of xsd:double-de. Where is the knowledge that these two value spaces intersect, and that the member of one is the corresponding member of the other? You seem to be doing some magic based on implicit human knowledge about the relationship between xsd:decimal and xsd:decimal-de (presuming there is one). Eh? Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 10:31:59 UTC