- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:28:25 +0000
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:25 19/02/2002 +0000, Jan Grant wrote: [...] > > o Are there features that could be dropped and > > still meet the needs of your users? (Which?) > >Of the datatyping options presented, I prefer the doublet approach, for >what it's worth. Does that mean: 1 you could drop the datatype triple 2 you could drop either the doublet or the datatype tripple and would prefer to drop the triple 3 none of the above (please clarify) > > o Does the proposal 'work for you'? > >As clean as the resulting MT may be, I still find this construction >ugly. This construction? Brian
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 09:29:51 UTC