- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:28:25 +0000
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:25 19/02/2002 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:
[...]
> > o Are there features that could be dropped and
> > still meet the needs of your users? (Which?)
>
>Of the datatyping options presented, I prefer the doublet approach, for
>what it's worth.
Does that mean:
1 you could drop the datatype triple
2 you could drop either the doublet or the datatype tripple
and would prefer to drop the triple
3 none of the above (please clarify)
> > o Does the proposal 'work for you'?
>
>As clean as the resulting MT may be, I still find this construction
>ugly.
This construction?
Brian
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 09:29:51 UTC