Re: why S doesn't require double properties [was: Datatyping Summary V4]

[...]

> Do you (or does anyone) disagree?
>
> If not, am I still the only one who can't live with this?
>
> Sorry if I appear to be overstressing this, but I honestly
> don't think very many folks have yet to appreciate the
> ramifications of this, and they are huge.

I guess we will see more than

  { ?s ns1:age ?o } -> { ?s ns2:age [ xsd:int ?o ] } .
and eventually
  { ?s ns2:age [ xsd:int ?o ] } -> { ?s ns1:age ?o } .

--
Jos

Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 18:40:28 UTC