- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:42:33 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 17:35 01/02/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] >I was really hoping we could get to a decision >on the datatypes stuff this week, but the >teleconference venue wasn't really enough bandwidth. >I have more to say, but I wonder if it's productive >to send more email-that-nobody-has-time-to-read. >Maybe ftf bandwidth is necessary. The volume of traffic is clearly becoming a problem. I note that in January, the message stats (aprox hand count) include: patS 125 graham 71 jeremy 59 patH 40 bwm 34 danC 25 jos 25 sergey 12 I would like to see us continue to make progress before the face to face and will be consulting with folks on how best to do that. In the meantime, please keep the discussion moving forward whilst exerting self discpline in the number and length of mail messages sent. I will continue to try to summarize the key issues on datatyping which may help folks who don't want to read all the traffic. Brian
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2002 12:43:56 UTC