W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2002

Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 15:48:35 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 16:14 10/02/2002 +0100, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

>and Statement is according to a "yes" on DanBri's entailment test case

A simple way to interpret the vote at Friday's telecon is that we decide 
that an rdf:Statement represents a stating (an occurence of a 
statement).  Would that then imply that the entailment does not follow; 
i.e. that two resources with the same values for their subject, predicate 
and object properties may denote different statings.

Received on Sunday, 10 February 2002 10:53:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:10 UTC