Re: Datatyping namespaces (was: Re: Datatyping use cases)

At 06:07 PM 2/18/02 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote:
>OK, I guess. But then why not use the rdfd: namespace idea? That would 
>make things easier for people, seems to me, since they could very quickly 
>see whether or not datatype magic was being utilized, and we could isolate 
>the 'special' aspects of the MT to a distinct namespace, which I like on 
>aesthetic grounds.

I think I prefer this too.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>

Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 06:56:11 UTC