Re: summary of reification?

>  >
>>then to be consistent we must also decide that anything (and nothing)
>entails:
>>
>>    _:s <rdf:type> <rdf:Statment> .
>>    _:s <rdf:subject> <subject> .
>>    _:s <rdf:predicate> <predicate> .
>>    _:s <rdf:object>    <object> .
>>
>>for any subject, predicate and object.
>
>i agree -- http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rdfr-theory.n3

Better not try to generate any entailment closures, then. Stick to 
backward reasoning if you value your hard drive.

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 12:16:28 UTC