- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 01 Feb 2002 17:35:08 -0600
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sorry about the call this morning, folks. I was frustrated about a bunch of stuff and I think I let it get to me. The power is back on at my (home) office now; that relieves some of the frustration... ;-) I was really hoping we could get to a decision on the datatypes stuff this week, but the teleconference venue wasn't really enough bandwidth. I have more to say, but I wonder if it's productive to send more email-that-nobody-has-time-to-read. Maybe ftf bandwidth is necessary. On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 16:28, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote: > RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-02-01 a small correction... > 13: Reification > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0218.html > > FrankM (as issue owner) will move forward > DanC: don't kid yourself by looking at syntax questions only what I meant was: don't kid yourself that you can decide how the syntax works without deciding (most of) how the model theory works. They're intimately related. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 18:35:11 UTC