- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:26:00 -0500
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Looks great, Pat. > >In subsequent word-smithing, we likely would want to clarify >the fact that (sans the A/B assertions) one can use rdfs:range >with a datatype class to constrain property values to the value >space of the datatype without imposing any lexical constraints, >and that rdfs:drange imposes both value and lexical constraints. Yes, it needs more wordsmithing to make things very clear, also ideally some usage examples to make all the points. >Thus, if one only cares that a given property has 'integer' >values, one need not define a separate class just for integers, >but can use an existing datatype class such as xsd:integer, >borrowing only its value space for the constraint, so to >speak. Right. And indeed also, following the discussion after the telecon, you can borrow its lexical space, if that interests you. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 17:25:57 UTC