- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:09:06 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Feb 22 2002 in America/New York which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Feb 22 2002 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore 1: Allocate scribe 2: Roll Call 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon (excluding f2f) - 10am Boston time, 01 Mar 2002 5: Review Minutes of 2002-02-15 telecon with correction See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2002-01-18#3 jjc Analyze implications of allowing xml:base anywhere see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0516.html ACTION: 2002-01-18#4 jjc Provide test cases for xml:base to illustrate any issues see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0516.html ACTION: 2002-02-08#2 Eric Arrange publication of model WD see: %20http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-mt-20020214/ ACTION: 2002-02-09#7 Sergey/Patrick/PatH to prepare a proposal based on PatH see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0409.html ACTION: 2002-02-15#2 bwm Consider holding teleconference(s) during F2F see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0564.html ACTION: 2002-02-15#3 bwm Announce new Model Theory WD to appropriate lists: rdf-logic, interest, ... see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Feb/0065.html see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2002Feb/0113.html ACTION: 2002-02-15#9 DanC Write up rdf:Bag idea and send to list see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0483.html 7: face to face meeting Telecon arrangements Meeting with I18N See: http://cgi.w3.org/Register/selectUser.pl?_w3c_meetingName=techplenary2002 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f 8: Status of Test Cases WD ACTION: 2001-11-30#3 Jan Grant Get access to test case areas of W3C site ACTION: 2002-01-11#2 JanG post summary of Test Cases WD outstanding updates to list. ACTION: 2002-01-11#1 bwm persue CVS access for Jan with EM 9: Preparing for the f2f Schema Issues: Danbri? 10: Model Theory for Containers Propose action PatH to update the model theory to state a semantics for rdf:Bag and rdf:Alt which is the same as that for rdf:Seq. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0072.html 11: Datatypes A proposal for datatyping was produced last week and comments round the table have been sought this week. The WG should now accept the proposal or propose specific actionable ammendments to it. Based on the discussion and feedback this week: Propose the WG request that the proposal should be ammended, if neccessary, to reflect the following: 1. The proposal should include support for the following idiom: <mary> <age> "10" . <age> <range> <integer> . # for some appropriate <integer> # for some appropriate <range> 2. That in case 1, the value of the age property is a 'string' which is constrained to conform to lexical space of a datatype indicated by <integer>, i.e. the node labelled "10" denotes the string "10". 3. That the doublet be dropped from the proposal (the rdf:value idiom). 4. That the datatype triple idiom be dropped from the proposal. Each requested ammendment will be considered in turn, in order. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0359.html 12: Issue rdfms-fragments Please see the description in the issues list. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-fragments 13: Issue rdfms-identity-of-statements [[ "There is a question whether or not there can be two different statements with the same subject, object and property. Most people seem to say "no". I have suggested that this should be allowed because it can be expressed in reified RDF statements and that there should be a 1:1 correspondence between what can be expressed in an RDF model and its reification. " ]] Propose: o the WG resolves that the entailment decision made in the previous weeks telecon resolves this issue, that the answer is yes and that this issue be closed. See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-of-statements http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html 14: Provenance ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 15:09:20 UTC