- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 01:00:20 +0000
- To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Agree. This how I'd expect CC/PP to deal with the issue. (Speaking for myself, etc.) #g -- At 12:05 PM 2/5/02 -0500, Daniel W. Connolly wrote: >On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Brian McBride wrote: > > > At 11:15 04/02/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > [...] > > > > >Yes, *if* one wants to use both idioms, one needs both sorts > > >of properties. > > > > That's my understanding and what the issue states, I think clearly. > >There's some lack of clarity somewhere; folks seem to be arguing: > > if communities need to use both datatyping idioms, > they need double properties. > > PRISM needs datatyping > => therefore > PRISM needs double properties > >which isn't a sound inference; it needs another premise: > > PRISM needs to use both datatyping idioms. > >I'm quite confident PRISM (and dublin core and most other apps) >will do just fine only using S-B. > >So I don't think the statement of the issue is sufficiently clear. > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >(writing from python10) ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 20:08:50 UTC