- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:27:45 +0200
- To: ext Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Oops. The variants <dc:date rdf:value="2002-02-14" rdf:dtype="&xsd;date"/> <dc:date xsd:date="2002-02-14"/> should produce different triples xxx dc:date _:1 . _:1 rdf:value "2002-02-14" . _:1 rdf:dtype xsd:date . (note the URIref, not literal) and xxx dc:date _:2 . _:2 xsd:date "2002-02-14" . OK? Patrick On 2002-02-15 13:21, "ext Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: >>>> Patrick Stickler said: >> On 2002-02-15 12:52, "ext Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> >>> Those bits of syntax generate different ntriples and if you want the >>> latter to be the same as the former, parser changes will be needed. >> >> No. They *should* generate different triples, since they are >> different idioms. Their equivalence is logical, not syntactic. > > You chopped out the bits of syntax I was refering to, so I have > really no idea what you want now? Do you want rdf:dtype to generate > statements a URI value, when used as an attribute? Is there > something to do with rdf:lvalue that I'm missing? etc. > > Dave > -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 06:26:19 UTC