- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:57:38 +0100
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
[...] >>and Statement is according to a "yes" on DanBri's entailment test case > >A simple way to interpret the vote at Friday's telecon is that we decide >that an rdf:Statement represents a stating (an occurence of a >statement). Would that then imply that the entailment does not follow; >i.e. that two resources with the same values for their subject, predicate >and object properties may denote different statings. yes, but then the subject of "Mary hit the-ball" should be a word starting with "M" and *not* my wife clarify versus fix? -- Jos
Received on Sunday, 10 February 2002 13:00:38 UTC