Re: doing provenance in RDF 1.0 clarified

[...]

>>and Statement is according to a "yes" on DanBri's entailment test case
>
>A simple way to interpret the vote at Friday's telecon is that we decide
>that an rdf:Statement represents a stating (an occurence of a
>statement).  Would that then imply that the entailment does not follow;
>i.e. that two resources with the same values for their subject, predicate
>and object properties may denote different statings.

yes, but then
the subject of "Mary hit the-ball"
should be a word starting with "M"
and *not* my wife

clarify versus fix?

--
Jos

Received on Sunday, 10 February 2002 13:00:38 UTC