- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 18:08:38 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:15 04/02/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] >Yes, *if* one wants to use both idioms, one needs both sorts >of properties. That's my understanding and what the issue states, I think clearly. Sergey - do you concur. [...] > > Issue B5: Storage Requirements > > =============================== > > > > status: disputed. > > > > TDL requires significantly more storage to implement. > >Sergey got back on this one, no? Yup, and then so did Patrick. So far as >I know the protagonists still disagree. Sergey: does Patricks latest proposal for an implementation strategy for TDL cause you to withdraw this issue? >In short: you may not need to store the whole string >lots of times, but you do need to store some sort >of distinct identity for each occurence of a string. Yup, plus performance implications of extra joins etc. >[my ride to the airport arrives...] :( Hope you had a good trip. Brian
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 13:10:07 UTC