Re: A basis for convergence and closure?

On 2002-02-05 17:48, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> 
> Patrick an important part was:
> 
>>> I hope we can all agree on 1,2, 3 and 10(yes).
>>> 
>>> I hope we can all live with any combinations of yeses and noes
>> on 5, 6, 7, 8
>>> and 9.
>> 
> 
> It would be good if all the people who had "can't live with" positions can
> agree on a "can live with" position.
> 
> It's my proposal, and while I have preferences for qu 5-9 I can live with
> any.
> Could you?

Unfortunately, no.

My present vote is still

> Yes: 1-4, 8, 10
> No: 5
> Maybe: 6,7 (if absolutely needed by MT)
> Open: 9

I'm very sorry that there is a 'no' in there, as
well as two maybe's, but I think I've explained
to death why my vote is such, and why I feel it
those issues are so important.

Cheers,

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 11:15:36 UTC