On adding easy keys and top/bottom to the spec.
timeline on ACTION-135 review rif-rdf-owl
enitty annotations
Agenda
ISSUE-122: Proposal to accept and resolve
I managed to update the documents according to the resolution of issues at the 2F2F
[public-owl-wg] <none>
Scribing for teleconfs
Names for top and bottom properties
- Re: Names for top and bottom properties
- Re: Names for top and bottom properties
ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles
- Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles
ISSUE-85: Optional restrictions
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys
Proposal to resolve issue-107 deprecate OWL Lite
ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox?
- Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox?
[UFDTF] Regrets for Monday's telecon
feedback on Easy keys and universal property
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-82
implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki
GRDDL non-action
Question about the topProperty
Action-141 non-xslt trick for GRDDL
[TF:Edu] First education document
New OWLED Wiki
Disposition of some recently raised issues
- Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues]
- Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues]
- RE: Disposition of some recently raised issues
owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111)
lang tag stuff ISSUE-71
OWL WG agenda for Wednesday 2008-04-23
Withdrawl ISSUE-117
Proposal to close Issue 63 - Defining an RDFS compatible semantics
Proposal to close Issue 80 - Defining an RDFS compatible semantics
General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
- Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21
Raised but not yet accepted issues
F2F3 survey -- per person or per organization?
ISSUE-122 (QCR RDF syntax): the "Expanding" RDF syntax for QCRs will damage OWL 2 Full
ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics?
ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility
- Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility
- RE: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility
ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions
ISSUE-118 (bNode semantics): Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have existential or skolem semantics?
RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics
[Imports Task Force] revised imports spec
closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule)
- Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule)
- RE: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule)
URGENT Survey on OWL F2F3
(interesting) history for ISSUE-111 mimetype
on issue-113 OWL-R non-entailments
Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams
- Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams
Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-109: namespaces for owl2 rdf/xml and xml/owl
Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents
ISSUE-117 (solipsism): RAISED: ditch comprehension principles
Minutes for review (last Wed)
pending review actions
Driving while EL++ (or high on DL Lite, or under the influence of OWL-R)
comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R?
OWL WG agenda
I would like to start implementing the schanges to the OWL spec tomorrow
Proposal to close Issue-9 and Issue-60
Easy Keys update
Proposed: Close ISSUE-76, ISSUE-77, and ISSUE-80
publications done
UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST
- Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST
- Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST
- Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST
First crack at profiles in primer
F2F2 Registration
Re: Receipt for Dinner for OWLED
owl xml serialization (example doesn't work)
new snapshots
W3C/MIT offer to host F2F3
Review of EL++ section (ACTION-118)
ISSUE-116 (axiomatictriples): Should Axiomatic Triples added to OWL-R Full?
Primer and Profiles checked
Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full?
Primer next steps
Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- OWL-R being more RDFish (was Re: Profiles intro)
- Re: OWL-R being more RDFish (was Re: Profiles intro)
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- Re: Profiles intro
- RE: Profiles intro
Agenda for TC Wed 2008-04-09
roll call from F2F2
F2F3
missing type in OWL-R-Full rule?
Profiles document
Small mistype in the OWL-R Full rules
ISSUE-115 (icon): Icon needed for the WG pages
schneider paradox
ISSUE-114 (general punning): Which combinations of punning should be allowed?
revised publication schedule
links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix
- Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix
- Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix
- Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix