comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R?

Alan,

The first rule in Table 5 of the profile document says

(?c rdf:type owl:Class) =>
 (?c rdfs:subClassOf ?c) and
 (?c owl:equivalentClasses ?c)

Isn't it necessary to have the same rule with rdfs:Class instead of 
owl:Class? Of course, that would lead out of the DL realm in the case of 
OWL-R-DL...:-(

Ivan

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf