- From: Alan Wu <alan.wu@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:02:04 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi, First, I think it is a very good idea to add such a note in the document. Second, I find it very hard to understand the current guidance as written. I am not sure how many people in this WG can tell the difference among profiles after just reading the guidance in the Profiles intro. If we cannot come up with a clear guidance at this moment, why don't we simply leave it out? That note itself should suffice. Thanks, Zhe Ivan Herman wrote: > > > Bijan Parsia wrote: >> As Carsten points out, this was a first cut so we'd have *something* >> and something by the pub date. I just wanted to note that there is a >> predictable comment in the offing and also that it's not clear >> *where* we should put the user guidance. So, in addition to the >> changes carsten already made, I've added the following editors note: >> >> """Editor's Note: The working group intends to provide more >> guidance for uses about how to select a profile well suited for their >> situation. It is not yet determined whether that guidance will be >> here or in the Primer.""" >> > > That was a very good idea. > > Ivan > > >> The current primer has a very abbreviated discussion of profiles >> (since we didn't even know whether we'd have them, or which ones). >> >> Cheers, >> Bijan. >
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 16:09:32 UTC