public-owl-wg@w3.org from April 2008 by author

Achille Fokoue

• On adding easy keys and top/bottom to the spec. (Wednesday, 30 April)

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Proposal to resolve issue-107 deprecate OWL Lite (Sunday, 27 April)
• Action-141 non-xslt trick for GRDDL (Thursday, 24 April)
• Disposition of some recently raised issues (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• OWL WG agenda for Wednesday 2008-04-23 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Proposal to close Issue 63 - Defining an RDFS compatible semantics (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Proposal to close Issue 80 - Defining an RDFS compatible semantics (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Proposal to close Issue 80 - Defining an RDFS compatible semantics (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Raised but not yet accepted issues (Monday, 21 April)
• Raised but not yet accepted issues (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics? (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Wednesday, 16 April)
• UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: references to OWL 2 Syntax (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Query for import task force (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Query for import task force (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• Teleconference Wed, April 9, 2008 (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: [Fwd: Comment on OWL 1.1] (came to webont-comment list, forwarding for archiving) (Sunday, 6 April)
• dc:creator use case (Friday, 4 April)
• Imports/Versioning proposal (Friday, 4 April)

Alan Wu

• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• feedback on Easy keys and universal property (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: missing type in OWL-R-Full rule? (Tuesday, 8 April)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: feedback on Easy keys and universal property (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: feedback on Easy keys and universal property (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [TF:Edu] First education document (Wednesday, 23 April)
• New OWLED Wiki (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Raised but not yet accepted issues (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Driving while EL++ (or high on DL Lite, or under the influence of OWL-R) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Easy Keys update (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (another comment) (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (Sunday, 13 April)
• Proposed: Close ISSUE-76, ISSUE-77, and ISSUE-80 (Saturday, 12 April)
• First crack at profiles in primer (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Review of EL++ section (ACTION-118) (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Primer and Profiles checked (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Primer next steps (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Profiles intro (Tuesday, 8 April)
• [meta] Re: missing type in OWL-R-Full rule? (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: revised publication schedule (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: revised publication schedule (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Query for import task force (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Query for import task force (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• Query for import task force (Sunday, 6 April)

Boris Motik

• I managed to update the documents according to the resolution of issues at the 2F2F (Monday, 28 April)
• [public-owl-wg] <none> (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Wednesday, 23 April)
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Wednesday, 16 April)
• I would like to start implementing the schanges to the OWL spec tomorrow (Monday, 14 April)
• The proposal for solving the RDF mapping issues (Friday, 4 April)
• A proposal for reintroducing deprecations into OWL 2 and thus addressing ISSUE-90 (Friday, 4 April)

Carsten Lutz

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Question about the topProperty (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Profiles document (Tuesday, 8 April)

Conrad Bock

• RE: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Wednesday, 16 April)

Deborah L. McGuinness

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: publication progress (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: [Cancelled Event] UFDTF TC @ Mon Mar 31 10am - 11am () (Tuesday, 1 April)

Diego Calvanese

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)

Elisa F. Kendall

• [UFDTF] Regrets for Monday's telecon (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST (Monday, 14 April)

Evan Wallace

• Re: [UFDTF] Regrets for Monday's telecon (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: the term "fragments" (Wednesday, 2 April)

Héctor Pérez-Urbina

• Agenda (Tuesday, 29 April)
• OWL WG agenda (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Agenda for TC Wed 2008-04-09 (Tuesday, 8 April)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys (Tuesday, 29 April)
• ISSUE-122: Proposal to accept and resolve (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Scribing for teleconfs (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• Names for top and bottom properties (Monday, 28 April)
• ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• ISSUE-85: Optional restrictions (Monday, 28 April)
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys (Monday, 28 April)
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-82 (Friday, 25 April)
• Proposal to close Issue-9 and Issue-60 (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)

Ivan Herman

• Re: owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (another comment) (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: First crack at profiles in primer (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: roll call from F2F2 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• missing type in OWL-R-Full rule? (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Small mistype in the OWL-R Full rules (withdrawn...) (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Small mistype in the OWL-R Full rules (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: small misspell in the profile document (Monday, 7 April)
• small misspell in the profile document (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: dc:creator use case (Friday, 4 April)
• [Fwd: Comment on OWL 1.1] (came to webont-comment list, forwarding for archiving) (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: the term "fragments" (Wednesday, 2 April)

Jeremy Carroll

• timeline on ACTION-135 review rif-rdf-owl (Tuesday, 29 April)
• enitty annotations (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: Proposal to resolve issue-107 deprecate OWL Lite (Monday, 28 April)
• GRDDL non-action (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• lang tag stuff ISSUE-71 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Withdrawl ISSUE-117 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Raised but not yet accepted issues (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics? (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents (Thursday, 17 April)
• (interesting) history for ISSUE-111 mimetype (Thursday, 17 April)
• on issue-113 OWL-R non-entailments (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-109: namespaces for owl2 rdf/xml and xml/owl (Thursday, 17 April)
• Minutes for review (last Wed) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• pending review actions (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: OWL-R being more RDFish (was Re: Profiles intro) (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: roll call from F2F2 (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-116 (axiomatictriples): Should Axiomatic Triples added to OWL-R Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: roll call from F2F2 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: roll call from F2F2 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• roll call from F2F2 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• F2F3 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• schneider paradox (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: small misspell in the profile document (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• HP comments on OWL-R (Thursday, 3 April)

Jie Bao

• Re: Profiles document (Tuesday, 8 April)

Jim Hendler

• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)

Kendall Grant Clark

• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)

Markus Krötzsch

• Re: On adding easy keys and top/bottom to the spec. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Question about the topProperty (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Question about the topProperty (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) (Wednesday, 23 April)

Michael Schneider

• RE: ISSUE-122: Proposal to accept and resolve (Tuesday, 29 April)
• RE: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Tuesday, 29 April)
• RE: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Sunday, 27 April)
• RE: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Friday, 25 April)
• ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Friday, 25 April)
• implementation of several resolutions in OWL 2 Full Wiki (Friday, 25 April)
• Question about the topProperty (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• RE: Disposition of some recently raised issues (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• RE: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec (Tuesday, 22 April)
• RE: OWL WG agenda for Wednesday 2008-04-23 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (Tuesday, 22 April)
• RE: Raised but not yet accepted issues (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (Monday, 21 April)
• RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (Sunday, 20 April)
• RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R? (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: First crack at profiles in primer (Sunday, 13 April)
• RE: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• RE: Profiles intro (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: roll call from F2F2 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: references to OWL 2 Syntax (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: ISSUE-113 (OWL-R nonentailments): Some OWL-R nonentailments are OWL-Full entailments (Tuesday, 8 April)
• RE: references to OWL 2 Syntax (Monday, 7 April)
• RE: small misspell in the profile document (Monday, 7 April)
• RE: f2f2 minutes - day 1 ready (Sunday, 6 April)
• Presentation on OWL 2 Full at F2F2 (Sunday, 6 April)
• FW: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL [RE: ACTION-102: The situation of deprecation in OWL-1.0-DL and OWL-1.0-Full] (Friday, 4 April)
• RE: ISSUE-109 (xmlnamespace): What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization (Thursday, 3 April)

Michael Smith

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)

Michel_Dumontier

• RE: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)

OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-122 (QCR RDF syntax): the "Expanding" RDF syntax for QCRs will damage OWL 2 Full (Monday, 21 April)
• ISSUE-121 (RDFS-based OWL 2 DL): Do we want/need an OWL 2 DL language, which is based on RDFS semantics? (Monday, 21 April)
• ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility (Sunday, 20 April)
• ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions (Sunday, 20 April)
• ISSUE-118 (bNode semantics): Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have existential or skolem semantics? (Sunday, 20 April)
• ISSUE-117 (solipsism): RAISED: ditch comprehension principles (Wednesday, 16 April)
• ISSUE-116 (axiomatictriples): Should Axiomatic Triples added to OWL-R Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• ISSUE-115 (icon): Icon needed for the WG pages (Tuesday, 8 April)
• ISSUE-114 (general punning): Which combinations of punning should be allowed? (Monday, 7 April)
• ISSUE-113 (OWL-R nonentailments): Some OWL-R nonentailments are OWL-Full entailments (Friday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-112 (Universal property): Universal property (a.k.a. universal role) missing in current OWL2 documents (Friday, 4 April)
• ISSUE-111 (userintentsignaling): There's no way to signal the intended semantics of an OWL document (Thursday, 3 April)
• ISSUE-110 (CURIE vs. QName): Use of CURIEs in Structural Specification (Thursday, 3 April)
• ISSUE-109 (xmlnamespace): What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization (Thursday, 3 April)
• ISSUE-108 (profilenames): Need to name the OWL Profiles (Thursday, 3 April)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: ISSUE-119: What can be done against the Russell paradox? (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: lang tag stuff ISSUE-71 (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: lang tag stuff ISSUE-71 (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: ACTION-93 / ISSUE-63: Initiated work on OWL-1.1-Full semantics (Monday, 21 April)
• [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml (Friday, 18 April)
• closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-109: namespaces for owl2 rdf/xml and xml/owl (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday April 14,2008 10AM EST (Sunday, 13 April)
• F2F2 Registration (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Receipt for Dinner for OWLED (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: owl xml serialization (example doesn't work) (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Profiles intro (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-115 (icon): Icon needed for the WG pages (Tuesday, 8 April)
• questionable links on all Wiki pages (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Annotations in 1.0-DL and 1.1-DL (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Query for import task force (Monday, 7 April)
• bug fix in reverse RDF mapping (Saturday, 5 April)
• bug fix in reverse RDF mapping (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: ISSUE-109 (xmlnamespace): What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization (Thursday, 3 April)

Rinke Hoekstra

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: feedback on Easy keys and universal property (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: closing ISSUE-22 (special syntax for role rule) (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Axiomatic triples in OWL-R-Full? (Wednesday, 9 April)
• OWL2 Logo (Thursday, 3 April)
• Review XML & Primer (Tuesday, 1 April)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Tuesday, 29 April)
• owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) (Tuesday, 22 April)
• F2F3 survey -- per person or per organization? (Monday, 21 April)
• URGENT Survey on OWL F2F3 (Thursday, 17 April)
• publications done (Friday, 11 April)
• owl xml serialization (example doesn't work) (Thursday, 10 April)
• OWL-R being more RDFish (was Re: Profiles intro) (Thursday, 10 April)
• new snapshots (Wednesday, 9 April)
• W3C/MIT offer to host F2F3 (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: roll call from F2F2 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: roll call from F2F2 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: roll call from F2F2 (Tuesday, 8 April)
• Re: links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix (Monday, 7 April)
• links between documents (was Re: revised publication schedule) (Monday, 7 April)
• revised publication schedule (Monday, 7 April)
• links in Profiles and Primer are broken; please fix (Monday, 7 April)
• references to OWL 2 Syntax (Monday, 7 April)
• TR-formatted versions (Monday, 7 April)
• publication progress (Monday, 7 April)
• F2F2 minutes (Friday, 4 April)
• f2f2 minutes - day 1 ready (Friday, 4 April)
• new snapshots (Wednesday, 2 April)
• the term "fragments" (Wednesday, 2 April)

Uli Sattler

• Re: Names for top and bottom properties (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday 2008-04-21 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: ISSUE-115 (icon): Icon needed for the WG pages (Tuesday, 8 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:41:19 UTC