- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:55:55 +0200
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 13:56:40 UTC
Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Michael Schneider wrote: > >> /I/ agree. But let's see what others think. My idea of processing this >issue >> was: >> >> 1) Raise the issue yesterday. >> 2) Open the issue on Wednesday. >> 3) Tell in next week's agenda that this issue is planned to be >closed. >> >> This would suffice to get most people be aware of it. But if you think >this is >> exaggerated, then we might not even open it on Wednesday... >> > >We have a lightweight process for editorial issues, and I am tentatively >advocating that this should be used for this issue. > >Jeremy Ah, but I believe that this isn't applicable in this case, since there doesn't exist an OWL 2 Full document at the moment. Cheers, Michael
Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 13:56:40 UTC