- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:28:14 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Yes. This makes sense to me too, Jeremy. -Alan On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Ian Horrocks wrote: >> This is a postponed issue from the OWL 1 WG saying that it would >> be desirable to have compound keys in OWL. This is covered by the >> existing EasyKeys proposal, so the issue seems moot. >> Ian > > Different words to say the same thing: > > Proposed to close the issue as addressed by EasyKeys. > > The reason for copying over the postponed issues is to provide > historical continuity, and I think we should be giving ourselves > (or at least Bijan and Uli) a pat on the back for addressing a long- > standing problem. > > Jeremy > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:28:58 UTC