Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility from Jeremy Carroll on 2008-04-21 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from April 2008)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:16:49 +0100
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
CC: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <480CA1D1.9010009@hpl.hp.com>

Michael Schneider wrote:
> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>> We have a lightweight process for editorial issues, and I am tentatively
>> advocating that this should be used for this issue.
>>
>> Jeremy
> 
> Ah, but I believe that this isn't applicable in this case, since there doesn't 
> exist an OWL 2 Full document at the moment.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 

We have already agreed that it is a delta on the S&AS section 5, so it 
seems analagous to the problems related to editorial issues in the 
member submission docs.

Jeremy

Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 14:17:44 UTC