- From: Alan Wu <alan.wu@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:50:12 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Bijan, > > Ok, I'll rephrase your point: Regardless of whether it's true or not, > RDFishness is not helpful in distinguishing fragments and may cause > extreme negative reactions. Thus, we should find other points for > guidance. > > Cheers, > Bijan. Could you please elaborate on the extreme negative reactions? Triple-friendly is indeed one of the features of OWL R. This allows a plain triple store vendor to adopt/add some OWL easily. And I don't see any harm in that. Of course, I don't intend RDFishness to be *the* distinguishing point or *the only" distinguishing point. OWL R, as designed, does facilitate/encourage implementations to materialize inference graph and consequently speed up query execution. Thanks, Zhe
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:52:33 UTC