- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:33:51 +0100
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 21, 2008, at 10:13 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: [snip] > Syntax: The proposal suggests using the serialization proposed by > the RIF BLD[2] for easy keys. No. The proposal suggest that the *translation to a rule* can be given using RIF. EasyKeys have their own functional syntax and I'll insert a proposal for mapping to RDF tomorrow. The basic outline is easy enough, something like: aClass owl:hasKey (list of key Properties) > A quick glance at the document cited reveals only an XML syntax, > and the RIF/RDF/OWL documentation[3] suggests that combinations of > RIF and RDF be made by way of using multiple documents. Is there a > RDF syntax proposed, and if not are we comfortable with having key > axioms specified in a non-RDF syntax. I've put the proposal into the Wiki. > Documentation: What impact would adding Easy Keys have on our user > facing documentation? There will be something in the Reference, of course, and I would suggest having it in the primer as well. It's a popular feature. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 21:34:32 UTC