- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:30:28 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
There is an implementation in java: http://xml.apache.org/commons/ components/resolver/ What I don't know is whether there being a java implementation would satisfy all reasoner developers - presumably there are non-java reasoners. -Alan On Apr 7, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> >> From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> >> Subject: Query for import task force >> Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 11:37:28 -0400 >> >>> About the external mapping file proposal (whether informative or >>> normative or whatev). >>> >>> Is there any reason that we cannot simply encourage implementors to >>> standardize on XML Catalog? >>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/entity/spec-2001-08-06.html >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Bijan. >> >> It is a bit heavier weight than I think is desirable, even if I was >> going along with having such a mapping file, which I'm not. >> >> peter > > > I also thought it looks heavier than might be desirable, from the > point of view getting developer adoption. Perhaps a limited subset > of it, or a minimal set of constructs with developers free to > implement more? > > -Alan > >
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 17:36:26 UTC