Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues] from Bijan Parsia on 2008-04-23 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from April 2008)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:40:42 +0100
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <DD52C0D3-A508-4632-A717-D1A65BD5FF56@cs.man.ac.uk>

On 23 Apr 2008, at 09:34, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Bijan Parsia wrote:
>
>>>   "OWL-x conform" reasoners *MUST NOT* infer non-entailments of  
>>> OWL-x.
>> I thought, in essence, this was the F2F resolution.
>
> me too
>
> I hope there is somewhere to record my -epsilon .... :)

It is burned into my brain.

I hear it in my dreams....a voice  
whispers..."Jeremy...disagrees....but only...a very....little...bit...."

(The "bit" echoes at least three times before becoming inaudiable.)

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 08:38:44 UTC