Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys

• From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:19:21 +0100
• To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
• CC: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4815DCE9.90507@hpl.hp.com>

Ian Horrocks wrote:
> 
> This is a postponed issue from the OWL 1 WG saying that it would be 
> desirable to have compound keys in OWL. This is covered by the existing 
> EasyKeys proposal, so the issue seems moot.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 

Different words to say the same thing:

Proposed to close the issue as addressed by EasyKeys.

The reason for copying over the postponed issues is to provide 
historical continuity, and I think we should be giving ourselves (or at 
least Bijan and Uli) a pat on the back for addressing a long-standing 
problem.

Jeremy

Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 14:20:18 UTC