- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:02:15 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
OK - but can you suggest some other names? On 28 Apr 2008, at 16:48, Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 28 Apr 2008, at 16:33, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >> Ian Horrocks wrote: >>> If we want to change the names then we should do it *soon* -- the >>> existing names are already in wide circulation, and the longer we >>> leave it the more difficult and confusing name changes will become. >>> Ian >> >> >> Is there anything *wrong* with the current names? >> (e.g. is any name a trade mark, or something that is already >> overly aligned with a particularly vendor? > > Nope. > >> Or offensive in some relevant natural language? etc. etc.) >> A separate question is are there any better names? > > Well, I always hear a post-incremented Evil Laugh when someone > types EL++...by that may be an idiosyncratic recation. > > DL Lite has the potential for several sorts of confusion (i.e., > with OWL DL, with OWL Lite, etc.) > > OWL-R is, afaict, widely loathed. > > Cheers, > Bijan.
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 16:02:50 UTC