- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:17:24 +0100
- To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- CC: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Michael Schneider wrote: > The WG will have to decide whether we want to have such an "RDF style" > OWL-DL clone or not in OWL 2. I cannot see a demand in the charter for such > a language. And I do not remember that there was any advocacy in the WG or > by someone else in favor for it (although I remember that there was once a > mail from a HP employee bringing this language into play). At a guess that was from David Turner, who was working for me (temporarily). Thus I feel free to remove any implicit HP support for this language (OWL-DL, RDFS compatible). If it is helpful to have it then so be it, if it is unhelpful then let's not. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 12:18:20 UTC