- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:46:06 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > OK, then let's at least try to move forward on ISSUE-106: > > PROPOSED: Resolve ISSUE-106 by making the owl2 namespace the same as > the owl namespace. > > peter Given that this would be a decision that the OWL namespace is mutable, we should document in what ways it is mutable, as specified by the TAG: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/namespaceState.html i.e. >> 2) we should state a policy for management of owl namespace in our >> documents; and as an errata in the old document too. >> Jeremy
Received on Friday, 18 April 2008 12:47:03 UTC