- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:17:03 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
i fixed the links to the 1.0 docs in the primer (inline and in the reference section) according to sandro's advice below. d Sandro Hawke wrote: >> Bijan Parsia wrote: >> >>> As I'm working on the primer, I'll fix those. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Bijan. >>> >>> >>> >> i sent this question to sandro >> ------------------ >> for the references to the published recs - the 1.0 docs - do we just >> have a direct link? >> so should for example we link directly to >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ >> >> currently we have for example: >> ; <span id="rec-owl-1-overview">[OWL Web Ontology Language Overview]</span> >> : <cite>[[OWL1_Overview|OWL Web Ontology Language Overview]]</cite>. W3C >> Recommendation 10 Feb 2004. McGuinness, van Harmelen, eds. >> > > The links should be to the frozen versions, eg > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/ > > If they are to the "latest version" (like > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/) then when/if we make a new Rec which > supercedes that, the link will go to there -- which probably isn't what > we want. > > -- Sandro > > >> but when we click the link in the doc it goes to a wiki page rather than >> the spec. >> how should that be updated to work so we can reference it internally and >> also link to the right place? >> >> we should link from the sentence: >> The recommendation documents include an Overview, a Language Guide, a >> Reference Manual, a Semantics and Syntax Document, a Test Case document, >> >> to each of those docs. it seems that the system in the primer is to >> link to the reference at the end - >> how is the best way to make that linking work? >> >> thx, >> d >>
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 15:17:40 UTC