Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys

Yes -- thanks!

Ian


On 29 Apr 2008, at 13:28, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> Yes. This makes sense to me too, Jeremy.
> -Alan
>
> On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
>>
>> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>>> This is a postponed issue from the OWL 1 WG saying that it would  
>>> be desirable to have compound keys in OWL. This is covered by the  
>>> existing EasyKeys proposal, so the issue seems moot.
>>> Ian
>>
>> Different words to say the same thing:
>>
>> Proposed to close the issue as addressed by EasyKeys.
>>
>> The reason for copying over the postponed issues is to provide  
>> historical continuity, and I think we should be giving ourselves  
>> (or at least Bijan and Uli) a pat on the back for addressing a  
>> long-standing problem.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:47:14 UTC